While the 2020 Griffith Med Revue, Broke Limb Nine-Nine, may have closed its curtains for the last time on Saturday night, it was a reminder of why the original TV series it\u2019s based on, Brooklyn Nine-Nine, continues to be so loved. While undoubtedly a popular comedy show, Brooklyn Nine-Nine does much more than just appeal to comedic sensibilities. I\u2019ll be honest, when Brooklyn Nine-Nine was first recommended to me, I was more than sceptical. A 20 minute TV comedy about cops? I was expecting some kind of Starsky and Hutch style, good-cop bad-cop, eating doughnuts and coffee, set in New York, boring comedy.<\/p>\n
However, what struck me from the first episode was that this was a show that was not going to rely on outdated cop comedy stereotypes to run itself. In fact, what sets Brooklyn Nine-Nine apart from many other comedies is the way in which it creates unique, authentic, and diverse characters that aren\u2019t just walking stereotypes. Throughout the seasons, viewers see how the characters grow and confront their flaws and gain a deeper understanding of each other. This is particularly evident in its representations of male characters.<\/p>\n
While there may be many representations of men in film and cinema, too often only a particular kind of man is positively represented: a man who is masculine, tall, muscular, charming and traditionally handsome. What particularly struck me about Brooklyn Nine-nine was how it positively represented men who do not fit this restrictive and frankly, regressive mould.<\/p>\n
(I\u2019ve tried to minimise spoilers, but if you\u2019re at all interested in watching Brooklyn Nine-Nine, please do so and then read the rest of this \ud83d\ude0a)<\/p>\n
Upon first impressions, Jake Peralta seems like the archetypal man-child comedy character (think Jack Black in School of Rock<\/em> or basically every movie starring Seth Rogen between 2007-2009). While his constant struggles with \u2018adulting\u2019 are a constant source of a comedic gold, the show doesn\u2019t let this get in the way of character development. We learn that his immaturity stems from his self-described \u2018daddy issues\u2019 due to his parents\u2019 divorce. As we learn more about his past, we also see Jake actively deal with his issues and strive to make genuine improvements to his life. In doing so, he becomes more responsible and more trustworthy and thereby a better detective and friend.<\/p>\n Charles Boyle is upon first appearances a character designed solely to be the butt of jokes. A self-described \u2018beta\u2019 male, Charles appears to lack stereotypically masculine traits and qualities. However, the show doesn\u2019t allow Charles to be a one-dimensional source of beta male bashing comedy. The show conducts a realistic balancing act between showing the comedic consequences and genuinely lovely outcomes of his kindness and generosity towards his friends. While he doesn\u2019t demonstrate traditional male bravado, there are many instances when he puts body on the line for his fellow officers. Charles can also be quite domineering and competitive when it comes to cooking and playing squash, once again showing the complexity of his characterisation. His passionate relationships in later seasons also challenge the notion people aren\u2019t physically attracted to \u2018beta\u2019 males.<\/p>\n Terry Jeffords is a character who is outwardly an alpha male: rippling with muscles and commanding those around him in his role as lieutenant. However, very early on, we see Terry struggle mentally with the possibility of dying at work and leaving his infant twin daughters fatherless. In fact, Terry is consistently portrayed as emotionally sensitive as well as a doting and committed father to his daughters. This juxtaposition of a very masculine looking man engaging in traditionally feminine behaviour is not just used for comedic purposes. Terry shows how being masculine doesn\u2019t necessarily exclude elements of femininity and viewers clearly see how his love for his daughters helps him strive to be a better man.<\/p>\n Captain Raymond Holt is perhaps one of Brooklyn Nine-Nine\u2019s best examples of breaking the mould of male character representations. A black, gay man in a position of power in an institution synonymous with cis, straight, white men immediately intrigues viewers. However, what is more striking is that the temptation to turn him into a gay male stereotype is deftly avoided by the show\u2019s writers. Instead, Raymond Holt is an incredibly formal, calm to the point of being almost unemotional leader with sophisticated cultural interests; once again a huge departure from the expectations for an NYPD captain. Holt\u2019s characterisation (and that of his husband, Kevin) shows that gay characters in mainstream entertainment can have unique characterisations that are independent of their sexuality.<\/p>\n In a world where society\u2019s narrow expectations of men can feel limiting, watching Brooklyn Nine-Nine provides a refreshing and at times thought-provoking reprieve. Its male characters show how you don\u2019t have to fit society\u2019s mould to be loved and respected. It instead privileges coming to terms with your past and improving yourself for the benefit of those around you; things we can all strive towards.<\/p>\n This article is part of a series of content for GUMS Wellbeing Men\u2019s Mental Health Month. If you\u2019re interested in more men\u2019s mental health content, keep an eye on the GUMS blog and the GUMS Wellbeing Facebook page. <\/em><\/p>\nCharles Boyle<\/h3>\n
Terry Jeffords<\/h3>\n
Raymond Holt<\/h3>\n
Concluding thoughts\u2026<\/h3>\n